GENOME-ENABLED PREDICTION OF GENETIC VALUES FOR USING RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NEURAL NETWORKS

Autores/as

  • Isabela de Castro Sant’Anna Autor/a
  • Moyses Nascimento Autor/a
  • Gabi Nunes Silva Autor/a
  • Cosme Damião Cruz Autor/a
  • Camila Ferreira Azevedo Autor/a
  • Leonardo Siqueira Gloria Autor/a
  • Fabyano Fonseca e Silva Autor/a

Palabras clave:

Dominance, neural network, genomic selection

Resumen

The objective of this work is to evaluate the efficiency of genomic selection (GS) of genome-enabled prediction by Radial Basis Function Neural Networks (RBFNN) in the prediction of genetic values considering dominance effects and diferent degrees of heritability. In addition, the results were compared with those obtained by G-BLUP. An F1 population with 500 individuals genotyped with 1000 SNP-type markers was simulated. The phenotypic traits were determined by adopting two different gene action models: additive and dominance admitting heritability levels (h2) 30 and 60%, each is controlled by 50 loci, considering two alleles per loco. The accuracy and the mean squared error root (MSER) were estimated using a five-fold cross-validation scheme. For the low heritability scenario, h2 = 0.3 in the additive scenario, the accuracy of validation was 31% for RBFNN, 58% for RR-BLUP, and in the complete dominance scenario the values were 28% e 25%, respectively. Additionally, when analyzing the MSER the difference in performance of the techniques is even greater. For additive scenario, the estimates were 97.33 RR-BLUP and 5.80 for RBFNN, in the most critical scenario, 91.31 GBLUP and 14.55 for RBFNN. Overall, a RBFNN shows accuracy lower than those obtained through G-BLUP. On the other hand, the RBFNN has low prediction bias. Finally, the adjustment of the GBLUP to dominance models despite increasing the complexity of the model also increased the predictive accuracy compared to the model without considering the dominance effect.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

ALMEIDA FILHO, J.E.; GUIMARÃES, J.F.R.; SILVA, F.F.; DE RESENDE, M.D.V.; MUÑOZ, P.; KIRST, M.; RESENDE JUNIOR, M.F.R. 2016. The contribution of dominance to phenotype prediction in a pine breeding and simulated population. Heredity,117(1).

ASVADI A.; KARAMI M.; BALEGHI, Y. 2011. Efficient object tracking using optimized K-means segmentation and radial basis function neural networks. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Research, 4(1):29-39.

AZEVEDO, C.F.; NASCIMENTO, M.; FONTES, V.C.; SILVA, F.F.; RESENDE, M.D.V.R.; CRUZ, C.D. 2019. GenomicLand: Software for genome-wide association studies and genomic prediction. Acta Scientiarum, 41:e45361.

AZEVEDO, C.F.; RESENDE, M.D.V.DE; E SILVA, F.F.; VIANA, J.M.S.; VALENTE, M.S.F.; RESENDE, M.F.R.; MUÑOZ, P. 2015. Ridge, Lasso and Bayesian additive-dominance genomic models. BMC Genetics,16(1).

CHEN, S.; COWAN, C.F.; GRANT, P.M. 1991. Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks. IEEE Transactions on neural networks, 2(2):302-309.

CROSSA, J.; PÉREZ-RODRÍGUEZ, P.; CUEVAS, J.; MONTESINOS-LÓPEZ, O.; JARQUÍN, D.; DE LOS CAMPOS, G.; BURGUEÑO, J.; CAMACHO-GONZÁLEZ, J.M.; PÉREZ-ELIZALDE, S.; BEYENE, Y.; DREISIGACKER, S. 2017. Genomic selection in plant breeding: methods, models, and perspectives. Trends Plant Science, 22(11):961-975.

CRUZ, C.D.; NASCIMENTO, M. 2018. Inteligência Computacional aplicada ao melhoramento genético. 1st ed UFV,Viçosa, 414p.

CRUZ, C.D. 2016. Genes Software ampliado e integrado com o R, Matlab e Selegen. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy, 38(4):547-552.

Descargas

Publicado

2019-12-02

Cómo citar

GENOME-ENABLED PREDICTION OF GENETIC VALUES FOR USING RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NEURAL NETWORKS. (2019). Functional Plant Breeding Journal, 1(2). https://www.fpbjournal.com/index.php/fpbj/article/view/7

Artículos similares

1-10 de 16

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a